Britain’s GCHQ has gone on the offensive against anti-vaccine propaganda. The Times says the SIGINT agency is using techniques proved against Islamic State online activity against state-sponsored purveyors of vaccine disinformation. It’s not a comprehensive rumor-control effort, but operates against state-directed disinformation only, not ordinary grassroots craziness.

The campaign against which GCHQ’s efforts are directed is Russian, Engineering and Technology reports. One of the disinformation campaign’s central claims seems unlikely to convince anyone: a COVID-19 vaccine developed in the UK by AstraZeneca and Oxford University  is bound to turn anyone who gets it into an ape, on account of that vaccine used a chimpanzee virus somewhere in its development. According to Reuters GCHQ is “taking down hostile state-linked content and disrupting the communications of the cyberactors responsible.” The Week suggests the motive for the disinformation is at least partly commercial: Russia is pushing widespread adoption of two vaccines developed there.

The US FBI last week made public an alert issued on a restricted basis back in October to the effect that “unknown…

Read More…

https://2020.riskawarenessweek.com/talks/addressing-the-failure-of-risk-quantification-moving-from-speculating-on-project-complexity-to-actually-quantifying-it/

This report is based on the author’s recent book ‘Modern Risk Quantification in Complex Projects: Non-linear Monte Carlo and System Dynamics Methodologies’ published by Oxford University Press this year.

Project practitioners and decision makers complain that both Monte Carlo and especially parametric methods fail to produce accurate project duration and cost contingencies in the majority of cases. Apparently, these methods have unacceptably high systematic errors as they miss out critically important components of project risk exposure. Namely, the components associated with structural and delivery complexity are usually overlooked.
Hence, this report zeroes in on the most crucial but systematically overlooked characteristics of complex projects. Any mismatches between two fundamental interacting subsystems – a project structure subsystem (PSS) and a project delivery subsystem (PDS) – result in non-linear interactions of project risks. Three kinds of the interactions are distinguished – internal risk amplifications stemming from long-term (‘chronic’) project system issues, knock-on interactions, and risk compounding.

Affinities of interacting risks compose dynamic risk patterns supported by a given project system. A new methodology to factor these patterns into Monte Carlo modelling is referred to as non-linear Monte Carlo methodology. (An integrated non-linear schedule and cost risk analysis (N-SCRA) version of the non-linear Monte Carlo methodology is discussed.) It allows adequately predict outcomes of even most notorious project-outliers comparable with Boston Big Dig Artery/ Tunnel project (1,400% overspending) or Sydney Opera House project (220% overspending).

Actually, all projects could be qualified as simple, complicated, complex or chaotic depending on their PSS and PDS characteristics. The traditional Monte Carlo methodology could be adequate enough but only in the case of simple projects when risk interactions are negligible. In all other cases of complicated, complex, and chaotic projects the proposed non-linear Monte Carlo methodology is a must.

In addition, a power of project system dynamics methodology is uncovered based on so-called project rework cycles when project risks are consistently added. It can be adopted as an accurate risk quantification methodology in complex projects as the results produced by the system dynamics and the non-linear Monte Carlo methodologies are comparable.

https://2020.riskawarenessweek.com/talks/addressing-the-failure-of-risk-quantification-moving-from-speculating-on-project-complexity-to-actually-quantifying-it/

RISK-ACADEMY offers online courses

+ Buy now

+ Buy now

+ Buy now

Related