data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb37d/bb37deabfa3bb67cf738bb4fb61ef3b21b4b818d" alt="Nassim Nicholas Taleb"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0375/d0375cdff2bcf25baaaa978c24a88c8225ee4728" alt="INCERTO"
(First Draft of the Foreword to Pierre Zalloua’s forthcoming book. For comments.)
Some people believe that the Levant is the end of the East and a portal to the West; others describe it as the end of the West and a portal to the East. Those in the first group tend to belong to the main branches of the Islamic faith, while those in the second belong to various Christian Levantine churches. Now, one might think that the two descriptions are equivalent: an intersection, after all, is an intersection. However, by the same mechanism that generates the so-called ‘narcissism of small differences,’ not only are these two statements not equivalent, but they are, in practice, contradictory. It even took a civil war for the Lebanese to understand this fallacy.
So the healthy way to think of the Levant is neither East nor West and, better, above such dichotomy; both its location on the Mediterranean and its proximity to both the Caucasus and Arabia (though separated by a desert) are highly deceiving.
The area has inflamed Western imagination for a long time, partially explained by the technology and cultural transfers that took place over three millennia. For Westerners, there has always been an aura of holiness and mystery, not just from its…