Why fragmented cyber risk management creates a false sense of security

0
1

A false sense of security.

A false sense of security.

Most organisations would say they are taking cyber risk seriously. They have invested in tools, built dashboards, appointed committees and implemented policies. On paper, it often looks robust. Yet when incidents occur, whether through a supplier breach, an overlooked vulnerability or an unexpected regulatory issue, the same question comes up. How did we not see this coming?

In our experience, the issue is rarely a lack of effort but a lack of coherence. Cyber risk is being managed in silos, which creates a comforting but misleading sense of control. It is merely the illusion of control.

When visibility is fragmented

Many organisations manage internal security posture in one place, third-party risk in another and threat intelligence somewhere else entirely. Each function produces its own reports and metrics, often based on different assumptions and data sets. Individually, these tools may be doing their job. Collectively, they fail to answer the question that matters most. What is our actual level of cyber risk right now, and where should we focus?

This is where the false sense of security sets in. When visibility is fragmented, risk becomes something…

Read More…

Актуальные книги на английском

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here